As per Illusion's own legal docs: you are NOT allowed to sell ANY kk related content.
Dont cry about people not respecting the law/rules when you never respected them in the first place
This is retard logic, the same kind people use to cry about game piracy. "muh imaginary sales".
NO! These people were never going to pay for your stuff.
Someone who wanted to buy it, is simply going to buy it. Someone who says "oh well i WAs going to buy it, but then it got posted online, so i didnt, is just a LARPing coper making excuses. We both know he never was gonna spend a dime.
I pay for anna anon and eatwaffles, because their stuff is good, even when it gets leaked day 1.
Well, my respectful friend who called me a retard — no hard feelings, I guess I still have a tiny bit of free will left to spread my delusions, even if you’ve already crowned yourself the sole owner of truth.
Let’s start with something simple: selling Koikatsu scenes or characters doesn’t harm ILLUSION. On the contrary, it helps popularize the tool and extend its relevance. You won’t find a single lawsuit from ILLUSION against a content creator. None. That clause in the EULA? It’s there to protect against plagiarism from
other companies, not individual creators making pocket change. No random scene creator is making millions to warrant legal action.
"Dont cry about people not respecting the law/rules when you never respected them in the first place" - Let’s talk about a basic principle called decency. You might think it’s clever to downplay the effort behind someone’s work, but when someone spends days—or even weeks—creating something, only to have it dismissed as worthless, that’s not something you should just ignore. Mocking that kind of dedication isn’t edgy—it’s disrespectful. And no amount of “they wouldn’t pay anyway” justifies devaluing the creator’s time and effort.
And by the way, I’m living proof that what you claim “never happens” actually does. I’ve
personally chosen not to support certain creators because I got a specific scene for free in a forum, and I redirected that support to someone else. I guarantee you there are plenty of others in similar situations. Assuming people would still pay for content they already have access to—just because
you do—is like saying everyone has the same financial means as you. That’s a serious lapse in logic.
Anyway, I reserve the right to respond since I was insulted by the colleague — judging and insulting are two different things, in case the colleague can’t tell the difference. Now, back to the scene sharing, thank you.